Frameworks are useful tools that help you analyze business issues, structure your thinking and communicate recommendations. Business frameworks can help you articulate goals with strong business writing and develop a blueprint for success. You can take a broader conceptual framework and scale it to fit your needs. A business framework also gives you a starting place and a common vocabulary that you can edit to fit your own purpose. Down below is a list of the most prominent frameworks and models in today’s business world. Frameworks can be categorized based on several levels of analysis:
- Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
- PESTEL Analysis
- Porter’s Diamond of National Advantage
- Industry Life Cycle
- Porter’s Five Forces
- Value Net Model
- Acquisition Integration Approaches
- A.T. Kearney Strategy Chessboard
- BCG Growth-Share Matrix
- GE/McKinsey Matrix
- McKinsey 7S Model
- Strategy Diamond
- Ansoff Matrix
- Bartlett and Ghoshal’s Matrix
- Business Model Canvas
- OLI Paradigm
- Porter’s Generic Strategies
- Profit Tree
- SWOT Analysis
- Value Chain Analysis
- Value Disciplines
- VRIO Framework
- AIDA Model
- Marketing Funnel
- Technology Adoption Life Cycle
- Product Life Cycle
- Price Elasticity
- Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid
- Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leader-Situation Matches
- Hersey and Blanchard’s Leadership Styles
- Kotter’s 8 Steps of Change (Management) Model
- Lewin’s 3 Step Model of Change (Management)
Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication, developed by Geert Hofstede. It describes the effects of a society’s culture on the values of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis. Over the years, this study led to six cultural dimensions on which nations can be ranked: Power Distance, Individualism/Collectivism, Masculinity/Femininity, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long-term/Short-term Orientation and Restraint/Indulgence.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/hofstedes-cultural-dimensions/ or https://geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html
Source: Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills CA: SAGE Publications.
Porter’s Diamond of National Advantage
The Porter Diamond is a model that is designed to help understand the competitive advantage nations or groups possess due to certain factors available to them, and to explain how governments can act as catalysts to improve a country’s position in a globally competitive economic environment.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/porter-diamond-model/
Source: Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
Originated as PEST Analysis, this framework is used in the early phases of strategy development to describe the landscape and environment in which a firm operates (PESTEL stands for Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental and Legal). Note: It is sometimes transformed into SLEPIT (Social, Legal, Economic, Political, Intercultural, Technological), STEEPLE (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Legal, Ethical) and DESTEP (Demographic, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, Political). This tool is especially useful when starting a new business or entering a foreign market. It is often used in collaboration with other analytical business tools such as the SWOT analysis and Porter’s Five Forces to give a clear understanding of a situation and related internal and external factors.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/industry-analysis/scanning-the-environment-pestel-analysis/
Industry Life Cycle
More information: –
Source: Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. The Free Press
Porter’s Five Forces
Porter’s Five Forces analysis is a framework that helps analyzing the level of competition within a certain industry. It is especially useful when starting a new business or when entering a new industry sector. According to this framework, competitiveness does not only come from competitors. Rather, the state of competition in an industry depends on five basic forces: threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of buyers, threat of substitute products or services, and existing industry rivalry.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/porters-five-forces/
Source: Porter, M.E. (1979). How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review
Value Net Model
The Value Net Model is an alternative to Porter’s Five Forces and recognizes the importance of competitors’ as well as complementary products in the industry. The model focuses on the four main groups that influence a company’s direct environment: Customers, Complementors, Competitors and Suppliers. Customers and Suppliers are described in similar terms to Porter’s model. Competitors however entails the Existing Rivals, New Entrants and the Substitutes in this model. The Complementors are a new element to the model.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/value-net/
Source: Brandenburger, A.M. & Nalebuff, B.J. (1996). Co-Opetition: A Revolution Mindset that Combines Competition and Cooperation. Crown Business.
Acquisition Integration Approaches
This framework distinguishes four different approaches to Acquisition Integration or Merger Integration depending on a company’s need for Strategic Interdependence between the acquirer and the target firm and the need for Organizational Autonomy: Preservation, Symbiosis, Holding and Absorption.
More information: –
Source: Haspeslagh and Jemison (1991). Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal
A.T. Kearney Strategic Chessboard
A.T. Kearney proposes four distinct strategic approaches using these two dimensions—predictability and a company’s ability to shape or adapt to its industry.
More information: http://www.atkearney.com/paper/-/asset_publisher/dVxv4Hz2h8bS/content/playing-on-the-new-strategy-chessboard/10192
Source: A.T. Kearney (2010). Playing on the New Strategy Chessboard.
BCG Growth-Share Matrix
The BCG matrix (also known as Boston Box) is a framework to help decision making on existing product lines. Developed in the 1970s, it has been used to evaluate how a company should think about its portfolio based on two criteria: the relative market share of a product and the market growth rate resulting in four archetypes: the Dogs, Question Marks, Stars and Cash Cows.
More information: https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/corporate_strategy_portfolio_management_strategic_planning_growth_share_matrix_bcg_classics_revisited/
Source: Henderson, B. (1970). Growth-Share Matrix. BCG Perspectives.
The nine-box matrix offers a systematic approach for the decentralized corporation to determine where best to invest its cash. Rather than rely on each business unit’s projections of its future prospects, the company can judge a unit by two factors that will determine whether it’s going to do well in the future: the attractiveness of the relevant industry and the unit’s competitive strength within that industry.
More information: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-ge-and-mckinsey-nine-box-matrix
Source: McKinsey & Company (2008). Enduring Ideas: The GE–McKinsey Nine-box Matrix. McKinsey Quarterly.
McKinsey 7S Model
The McKinsey 7S Framework is a management model developed by business consultants Robert Waterman Jr. and Tom Peters in the 1980s. The 7 S’s are Structure, Strategy, Systems, Skills, Style, Staff and Shared values. The model is most often used as an organizational analysis tool to assess and monitor changes in the internal situation of an organization. The model is based on the theory that, for an organization to perform well, these seven elements need to be aligned and mutually reinforcing. So, the model can be used to help identify what needs to be realigned to improve performance, or to maintain alignment (and performance) during other types of change
More information: http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-7-s-framework
Source: McKinsey & Company (2008). Enduring Ideas: The 7-S Framework. McKinsey Quarterly.
The framework (developed by Donald Hambrick and James Frederickson) puts the economic logic at the center of the analysis. Five dimensions are analyzed: Arenas, Vehicles, Differentiators, Staging and Economic logic. Strategy is about making important choices, and the real power of the Strategy Diamond is that it integrates important choices into a bigger picture instead of as a piecemeal approach.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/what-is-strategy/
Source: Hambrick & Fredrickson (2005). Are You Sure You Have a Strategy? The Academy of Management Executive.
There are different ways of growing a business. Igor Ansoff identified four strategies for growth and summarized them in the so called Ansoff Matrix. The Ansoff Matrix (also known as the Product/Market Expansion Grid) allows managers to quickly summarize these potential growth strategies and compare them to the risk associated with each one. The idea is that each time you move into a new quadrant (horizontally or vertically), risk increases.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/ansoff-matrix-grow-business/
Source: Ansoff, I. (1957). Strategies for Diversification. Harvard Business Review.
Bartlett and Ghoshal’s Matrix
An often used framework to distinguish multiple forms of internationally operating businesses is the Bartlett & Ghoshal Matrix (1989). Bartlett and Ghoshal clustered these businesses based on two criteria: global integration and local responsiveness. The resulting quadrants can be labelled with businesses having a: global strategy, transnational strategy, international strategy or multidomestic strategy.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/international-business-strategy/
Source: Bartlett, C.A. & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Business Model Canvas
The excellent work by Alex Oesterwalder opens the door to companies that need to rethink their business model. It offers a practical step-by-step process to find new ways to create value and analyze a company’s current model.
More information: http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/ or http://alexosterwalder.com/
Source: Osterwalder et al. (2004). The Business Model Ontology: A proposition in a Design Science Approach.
OLI Paradigm/Eclectic Paradigm
The OLI Paradigm is a tool that helps management choose between several foreign market entry-mode strategies such as exporting, licensing and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). According to this framework, a company needs three advantages in order to be able to successfully engage in FDI: Ownership advantage, Location advantage, Internalization advantage. If any of these advantages is not present, management might want to choose different entry-mode strategies such as exporting or licensing instead. The framework was initially developed by John Dunning in 1979 under the name Eclectic paradigm. Dunning draws upon theories such as the internalization theory and the transaction cost theory to validate his framework.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/choosing-the-right-entry-mode-strategy/
Source: Dunning (1979). Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests. Journal of International Business Studies.
Porter’s Generic Strategies
Porter’s generic strategies describe how a company pursues competitive advantage by positioning itself in between its rivals. There are three generic strategies for competitive advantage: Cost Leadership, Differentiation and Focus. A company chooses to pursue one of two types of competitive advantage, either via lower costs and thus a lower price or by differentiating itself along dimensions valued by customers to command a higher price. A company also chooses one of two types of scope, either focus (offering its products to selected segments of the market) or industry-wide, offering its product across many market segments. Combined these strategies offer four potential ways of companies to position themselves. Companies that try to excel in all of these ways would end up somewhere ‘stuck in the middle’, according to Porter.
More information: –
Source: Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Harvard Business Review.
The profit tree is a simple but very effective way to structure a company’s revenue and cost streams. It allows a company to see where improvements can be made in case of profitability issues.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/profitability-case-interview/
SWOT Analysis (Strenghts, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) is a structured method to analyze both internal and external factors that are likely to affect a company’s success. This framework needs little introduction as it has been used and overused in virtually every strategic planning discussion. It needs to be combined with the TOWS matrix to gain additional insights.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/swot-analysis/
Value Chain Analysis
A systematic approach to analyze your value chain, and identify where to create the greatest value for the customer.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/value-chain/
Source: Porter (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Simon and Schuster.
More information: –
Source: Treacy, M. & Wiersema, F. (1993). The Discipline of Market Leaders. NY: Addison-Wesley
VRIO framework (formerly known as VRIN) is a business analysis tool that helps assessing the internal sources of sustainable competitive advantage and is therefore part of the Resource-Based View (RBV). According to this model, resources and capabilities should have four attributes that lead to sustainable competitive advantage. Resources should be Valuable, Rare, Inimitable and Organisation-wide supported: VRIO.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/vrio-from-firm-resources-to-competitive-advantage/
Source: Barney. (1995). Looking Inside for Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive.
The AIDA Model is a well-known marketing tool to help base advertising decisions on for customers in different stages of the decision-making process. In every stage marketeers will have to adapt their marketing campaigns in order to help customers move from one stage to the next.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/aida-model/
Source: Strong, E.K. (1925). Theories of Selling. Journal of Applied Psychology.
The marketing funnel is a great tool that helps visualizing the customer journey or the path that prospects take as they become more familiar with your company and products, from awareness to purchase to (hopefully) the advocacy stage.
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/marketing-funnel/
More information: –
Technology Adoption Life Cycle
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/crossing-the-chasm-technology-adoption-life-cycle/
Source: Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe
Product Life Cycle
More information: http://productlifecyclestages.com/
Source: Levitt (1965). Exploit the Product Life Cycle. Harvard Business Review.
Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/blake-mouton-managerial-grid/
Source: Blake, R. & Mouton, J. (1964). The Managerial Grid: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leader-Situation Matches
More information: –
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Styles
More information: https://www.business-to-you.com/hersey-blanchard-situational-leadership-model/
Source: Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K.H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training & Development Journal.
Kotter’s Eight Steps of Change (Management) Model
More information: –
Lewin’s Three Stage Model of Change (Management)
More information: –
The Best Business Frameworks, Management Frameworks and Strategy Frameworks